Thurrock: A Visionary Brief in the Thames Gateway
Home Thurrock guides and maps Artists and writers explore
International examples Have your say Local projects
Project timeline Project funders Contact
Riverfront Access Green Spaces Cultural Facilities
   
   
Hidden Purfleet - public works
 
  Tools to address obstacles to cultural identity
 
 
Click on an image below to send an e-card.
1) Addressing the need to increase COLLECTIVE MEMORY:
When a place shows traces of community engagement and potential development, it becomes the duty of care of those who regenerate the area to utilise the existing community structures to nourish this potential further. This does not mean a top-down approach but rather a bottom-up approach, enabling the locals to take ownership.
2) Addressing the LACK OF CENTRE(S):
To encourage community/cultural development we need to create potential environments where collective memory can be shared. These environments need to be both informal and formal as well as public in nature.The youth have appropriated some of the existing public spaces. These spaces become their localised places of exchange, while the adults are left with even less appropriate place of informal exchange.
3) Addressing the need to reduce DIVIDED COMMUNITIES:
This is an issue which needs to be tackled both physically (in terms of places of gathering) and socially (through collective events at the village).The physical aspect is partly tackled by the previous topic - lack of a centre. It is important that new locations are identified by the local community for both formal and informal events. Collective events organised by the local community can range from being pleasure orientated to community development programs or mixed. These events can potentially be arranged by the youth for themselves or the town. The BARBECUBE offered to Purfleet by public works for a period of time (to be discussed) becomes a tool or a vehicle where these events can take place.

4) Assessing ERASURES AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS:
1) Do the structures being erased contribute to the existing and present community development? If so, how?
2) How much of the site(s) being developed become closed off to the public?
3) It is important to note that mere public access to certain areas of sites
being developed is not enough, only if the public access leads to a usable public domain. This can be enclosed or open. How is this achieved?
4)How does the new development fit into the cultural strategy for Purfleet?
5) How can the beneficial aspects of what is being erased be transformed and reappropriated into parts of the new developments?